Skip to main content

Lelia Miller and Moira Greyland show us what not to do

Msgr. Charles Pope points out to us that one cannot prevent a divorce by banishing the couple in trouble from one's life, or by being so forceful that the couple, so intent on divorce, removes you from their life.

But I am adamant that all divorce is a worse abuse than the abuse it is trying to prevent. I have never known any situation where adding the complication of divorce makes it better.

Nothing has proven this more to me than reading Leila Miller's new book Primal Loss, the book that Msgr Pope was reviewing in the above article. This book shows the lies that marriage is primarily about the married couple, and that children are resilient; rather it shows that the damage done by even the most innocent and friendly of divorces, has philosophical revelations that reverberate down through many future generations.

Likewise, the real life horror story of Moira Greyland's The Last Closet shows us just how bad a mindset based in the possibility of divorce can become for the children. Her parents had an open marriage, raising children who, in their words, were not "hung up" on sex and who were supposedly not prudish. Except it backfired, and of the three children involved in their "family" and the many, many visitors abused by her father, most are not what I would call functioning individuals today; and a few are dead from suicide or various STDs.

I would love to believe that Pope Francis does not know how his words are being translated and twisted to destroy the letter and spirit of the law. Many of his translators should be fired and replaced with the very orthodox, rigid people he seems to hate so much when translated into English. There is a reason why we are rigid and orthodox though: Because we know, beyond any doubt, just how incredibly destructive things can get when we follow what we mistakenly think is the spirit of the law- but ignore the truth to the point that we obliterate both the spirit and the letter of the law.

When we fail to follow The Word made Flesh, it is easy to use the Spirit of the Law to destroy The Letter of The Law.

Popular posts from this blog

Conscience and Amoris Laetitia.

Recently, Cardinal Cupich  suggested that the correct reading of Amoris Laetitia is that subjective conscience is the final arbiter of morality.  This leads to Three crises in Catholic Teaching  because it removes Catholic Teaching from the realm of objective fact, and substitutes subjective feeling. Archibishop Sample has already anticipated these issues , and his encyclical, A True and Living Icon, is the ultimate antidote to the confused mess that is subjective conscience interpretation on this topic.  For this blog, as I get more time to work on it later in the spring and this summer, it is Archbishop Sample's interpretation, not Cardinal Cupich, that is my standard for marriage.

Intrinsically evil

Part of my reason for starting this study is that, at least as of March 2018, I'm significantly more conservative on this subject than the rest of the Catholic Church.  This blog will either end up as a heretical view on marriage, or a catechism looking at the sad state of marriage in the 21st century and how to avoid your marriage bringing you a living hell. How do I know that marriage can end up in a living hell?  How do I know Divorce is intrinsically evil even though CCC 2383  says that in certain extreme conditions it is permissible?  Because in my country, over the last five generations, we've been running a living experiment in how to ruin families and destroy the sacrament, and we now know beyond any shadow of doubt that divorce causes hell in this life.   Even when done with the best of intentions, the best of reasons.  Even when you are certain that an abuser will kill you, divorce will make the situation worse.

No, subjective conscience does not set aside the moral order

The Archdiocese of Washington DC put forth their answer to Amoris Laetitia this week, and this review on The Catholic Thing  is well worth reading. It points out that the subjective conscience, being without full understanding of Church Teaching, is actually incompetent to judge morality. Moral Order exists for a reason.  Free will, while a great gift from God, is also a very dangerous gift from God,   Moral Order, when you enshrine it in your marriage and in your home, keeps your marriage safe from the very abuses I've written about in previous articles.  Far from being burdensome as most imagine, Moral Order frees us to truly love, as opposed to just "accept" and "tolerate" that which is wrong. And that, as you start your married life together, is an invaluable lesson- children need boundaries, and so does your marriage.