Skip to main content

Lelia Miller and Moira Greyland show us what not to do

Msgr. Charles Pope points out to us that one cannot prevent a divorce by banishing the couple in trouble from one's life, or by being so forceful that the couple, so intent on divorce, removes you from their life.

But I am adamant that all divorce is a worse abuse than the abuse it is trying to prevent. I have never known any situation where adding the complication of divorce makes it better.

Nothing has proven this more to me than reading Leila Miller's new book Primal Loss, the book that Msgr Pope was reviewing in the above article. This book shows the lies that marriage is primarily about the married couple, and that children are resilient; rather it shows that the damage done by even the most innocent and friendly of divorces, has philosophical revelations that reverberate down through many future generations.

Likewise, the real life horror story of Moira Greyland's The Last Closet shows us just how bad a mindset based in the possibility of divorce can become for the children. Her parents had an open marriage, raising children who, in their words, were not "hung up" on sex and who were supposedly not prudish. Except it backfired, and of the three children involved in their "family" and the many, many visitors abused by her father, most are not what I would call functioning individuals today; and a few are dead from suicide or various STDs.

I would love to believe that Pope Francis does not know how his words are being translated and twisted to destroy the letter and spirit of the law. Many of his translators should be fired and replaced with the very orthodox, rigid people he seems to hate so much when translated into English. There is a reason why we are rigid and orthodox though: Because we know, beyond any doubt, just how incredibly destructive things can get when we follow what we mistakenly think is the spirit of the law- but ignore the truth to the point that we obliterate both the spirit and the letter of the law.

When we fail to follow The Word made Flesh, it is easy to use the Spirit of the Law to destroy The Letter of The Law.

Popular posts from this blog

No, subjective conscience does not set aside the moral order

The Archdiocese of Washington DC put forth their answer to Amoris Laetitia this week, and this review on The Catholic Thing  is well worth reading. It points out that the subjective conscience, being without full understanding of Church Teaching, is actually incompetent to judge morality. Moral Order exists for a reason.  Free will, while a great gift from God, is also a very dangerous gift from God,   Moral Order, when you enshrine it in your marriage and in your home, keeps your marriage safe from the very abuses I've written about in previous articles.  Far from being burdensome as most imagine, Moral Order frees us to truly love, as opposed to just "accept" and "tolerate" that which is wrong. And that, as you start your married life together, is an invaluable lesson- children need boundaries, and so does your marriage.

Are We Bad or Good by Nature? - The Catholic Thing

Are We Bad or Good by Nature? - The Catholic Thing : "Catholics of the right are basically, whether they realize it or not, Augustinians; and Catholics of the left, whether they realize it or not, are basically Rousseauvians." What has this got to do with marriage?  Catholic couples who are on the same page in the Augustine vs Rousseau debate, will have less strife in their lives.  I would even argue that children raised under an Augustinian point of view will grow up to see a need for the Church and Religion in their lives- and children raised under Rousseau's point of view, leave the church to try to create their own Utopia, their own Heaven on Earth. So, dear imaginary couple I'm writing this blog for- who are you?  Have you discussed this with your spouse or your intended spouse?  Are human beings good, and evil just a bad coincidence?  Or are human beings bad, and good only comes by the grace of God and listening to wisdom?

Conscience and Amoris Laetitia.

Recently, Cardinal Cupich  suggested that the correct reading of Amoris Laetitia is that subjective conscience is the final arbiter of morality.  This leads to Three crises in Catholic Teaching  because it removes Catholic Teaching from the realm of objective fact, and substitutes subjective feeling. Archibishop Sample has already anticipated these issues , and his encyclical, A True and Living Icon, is the ultimate antidote to the confused mess that is subjective conscience interpretation on this topic.  For this blog, as I get more time to work on it later in the spring and this summer, it is Archbishop Sample's interpretation, not Cardinal Cupich, that is my standard for marriage.